Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg testifies in Assange’s protection, says WikiLeaks uncovered ‘struggle crimes’ in ‘public curiosity’

Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg testifies in Assange’s defense, says WikiLeaks exposed ‘war crimes’ in ‘public interest’

Whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg – whose ‘Pentagon Papers’ leak uncovered unlawful US bombing throughout the Vietnam Warfare – mentioned Julian Assange wouldn’t see a good trial if extradited to the US, evaluating the writer’s case to his personal.

Testifying at Assange’s extradition listening to on Wednesday, Ellsberg mentioned the WikiLeaks co-founder could be denied an opportunity to defend himself if despatched to the US for a trial, noting that, like in his personal case, Assange wouldn’t be permitted to argue his publications had been within the ‘public curiosity.’

“I observe the closest of similarities to the place I confronted, the place the publicity of illegality and felony acts institutionally and by people was meant to be crushed by the administration finishing up these illegalities,” Ellsberg instructed the courtroom.

[Assange] can not get a good trial for what he has completed underneath these prices in the USA.

WikiLeaks disclosures – such because the grisly ‘Collateral Homicide’ video, displaying an American gunship firing on Iraqi journalists – have uncovered proof of struggle crimes, the famed whistleblower went on, arguing that People had a proper to know what their authorities had completed of their identify.

“I used to be acutely conscious that what was depicted in that video deserved the time period homicide, a struggle crime,” he mentioned of the ‘Collateral Homicide’ footage, including in his written testimony that the video confronted residents with the “actuality of our struggle.”

The American public wanted urgently to know what was being completed routinely of their identify, and there was no different approach for them to study it than by unauthorized disclosure.

Additionally on

Snowden warns that Assange extradition will lead free press to slaughterhouse as writer’s critics blinded by partisanship

On cross examination, a lawyer appearing on behalf of Washington, James Lewis, argued that Assange was not being prosecuted for the notorious video particularly, however quite for publishing the navy’s labeled guidelines of engagement in Iraq, amongst different issues. Ellsberg replied that disclosing the principles was essential to exhibit the struggle crimes dedicated within the video, including that as an alternative of punishing the troopers concerned, the federal government was now prosecuting the person who revealed proof of their wrongdoing.

Lewis additionally challenged Ellsberg’s comparability to his personal 1971 ‘Pentagon Papers’ leak – wherein he handed 7,000 pages of labeled paperwork on the Vietnam Warfare to the press – observing that Ellsberg had withheld info from the disclosure. Nevertheless, the whistleblower mentioned he had not redacted a single identify of an informant or covert CIA agent, and that in contrast to himself, Assange had withheld some names, and even approached the Protection and State Departments for assist in making extra redactions. He was denied, Ellsberg mentioned.

“So it’s all of the governments’ fault then,” Lewis shot again.

“Sure, they bear a heavy accountability,” Ellsberg responded, including that the federal government’s sudden concern about redactions was “extremely cynical” on condition that officers had rebuffed Assange’s request for help.

Additionally on

A supporter protests outside the Old Bailey in London ahead of a hearing to decide whether Julian Assange should be extradited to the United States. © REUTERS/Henry Nicholls
US prosecutors disrupt Spanish probe into alleged CIA-linked agency which spied on Assange

Ellsberg – a former strategic analyst for RAND Corp. who repeatedly labored with the State Division and the Pentagon between the 1950s and 1970s – disclosed proof that the US had illegally expanded its bombing marketing campaign on Vietnam into neighboring Laos and Cambodia, in addition to how American officers in 4 administrations had misled the general public concerning the struggle effort. Following the leak, Ellsberg was charged with 12 counts underneath the Espionage Act, the identical regulation underpinning most of Assange’s prices, and confronted as much as 115 years in jail. His case was in the end dropped after it was revealed that the federal government had gathered proof in opposition to him illegally.

Assange stays in custody at London’s most safety Belmarsh jail as he awaits a verdict in his extradition case, which is about to final into early October. If despatched to the US for trial, the WikiLeaks writer faces a 175-year jail sentence, charged with 17 counts linked to espionage and pc intrusion over his position in disclosing labeled materials.

Like this story? Share it with a pal!

Posted In Top

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *