The US indictment of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his subordinates on narcotrafficking costs echoes the rationale used to invade Panama and kidnap its chief – and People aren’t precisely thrilled with the reprise.
The Justice Division’s indictment of Maduro and 4 different senior Venezuelan officers on narcotrafficking costs – and the State Division’s supply of as much as $15 million as a reward for proof supporting these costs – reminded so many social media customers of the 30-year-old plot to take away then-Panamanian president Manuel Noriega from workplace that the previous CIA asset’s title was trending on Twitter on Thursday.
Maduro’s indictment marks the second time that the U.S. authorities has introduced felony costs towards a international head of state. The final time was in 1989, when federal prosecutors indicted Panamanian Manuel Noriega on drug-trafficking costs and U.S. army forces seized him. https://t.co/LfMfQAh9Gx
— Pablo Arosemena Marriott (@parosemena) March 26, 2020
Basic CIA transfer to justify future coup/kidnapping of Latin-American head of state who annoys them.
AKA “the Noriega”. https://t.co/662hdUICRg
— lnteGritty (@lnteGritty) March 26, 2020
From the costs – conspiring with Colombian guerrillas to “flood the US with cocaine” – to the purpose man on each initiatives – present particular consultant for Venezuela Elliott Abrams (branded a “conflict felony” by critics) – the 2 circumstances are almost twins. Along with drug-running, Noriega additionally helped the US by supporting the Contras in Nicaragua, historical past that has all of a sudden turn out to be related once more after the Trump administration quietly sanctioned Nicaragua’s authorities earlier this month.
To not point out that the US on the very least "turned a blind eye" to Noriega's drug actions.
By the way, that was Elliot Abrams who most helped cowl for Noriega. Abrams, who in all probability got here up with this phony cost towards Maduro.https://t.co/EEgBUPtK1Y
— Our Hidden Historical past (@OurHiddenHistry) March 26, 2020
Accusing Nicolas Maduro of drug trafficking is silly af. These persons are simply constructing the the case for conflict — they’re pondering: 1) WW2 received us out the melancholy in 1941 2) People supported the overthrow of Noriega in 1989 3) the Bolivarian Revolution have to be crushed.
— SocialistBoomer (@SocialistBoomer) March 26, 2020
Few who understood the historical past had been thrilled with the thought of pulling a Noriega on Maduro, nonetheless. CIA-supported Noriega had truly trafficked cocaine for years earlier than he was charged, and many believed the invasion of Panama had been orchestrated to stop him from opening his mouth about his relationship with the company.
Wasn't Noriega working medication *FOR* the CIA and when it turn out to be publicly detrimental to assist him they abandon him? The US tries to faux they had been manipulated by army ruler of poor as balls third world nation *which the US created* https://t.co/sy0vEG5iCc
— Socialism isn't State subsidy for personal corp (@MaatMHI) March 26, 2020
Noriega had the products on CIA drug flights to and from Nicaragua through Panama. After all, he by no means received his press convention to inform it…
— Robert A. Stansbury (@BetoMetroDos) March 26, 2020
Nonetheless, the Justice Division has not produced any proof that Maduro is responsible – and the huge State Division rewards for proof recommend that Washington is in dire want of proof within the Venezuelan case – making the “Noriega choice” for Venezuela even much less morally defensible than the invasion of Panama.
Deja vu? @AGWilliamBarr and Elliott Abrams, the highest @StateDept diplomat for Venezuela, in late 80s pushed for ouster and removing of Panama strongman Manuel Noriega to face US drug costs. Maduro typically accuses US of plotting an invasion like one which adopted Noriega's indictment
— Joshua Goodman (@APjoshgoodman) March 26, 2020
The identical forces within the US accusing Maduro, labored with the drug cartels within the 1980's bringing in cocaine to American internal cities ( Barry and the Boys–one instance), whereas arming contra's in central America.
These are the identical forces desirous to topple Maduro.
— Stephen Oldfield 🌹 🌺🌻 (@PhiSteveO) March 26, 2020
Others had been extra disgusted with the timing of the indictments. “They will’t cease coup-ing even throughout an outbreak!” one shocked consumer tweeted.
They’re actually making an attempt to Noriega him in the course of a pandemic lmfao https://t.co/7cDasNe4p2
— Heather Habsburg (@HeatherHabsburg) March 26, 2020
However some appeared to suppose invading Panama to grab up Noriega had been a splendid little conflict, and pushed for a similar in Venezuela.
This sounds acquainted …
Perhaps Maduro ought to keep in mind what occurred to Manuel Noriega in Panama … pic.twitter.com/coAFlxv6ss
— Villi Wilson❌ (@Conservative_VW) March 26, 2020
Let’s GO GET HIM!😎🇺🇸
FLASHBACK OPERATION “JUST CAUSE”! We will put him in the identical Atlanta cell as Previous Pineapple Face!
U.S. Invasion of Panama 1989-1990. Noriega Arrested & Convicted of worldwide racketeering & drug trafficking. #Maduros pic.twitter.com/Yy72uZq6w6
— Sgt Daniel L McCaughan (@DanMcCaughan) March 26, 2020
Legal professional Basic William Barr truly affirmed the Noriega comparability as he tried to dispel the concept that the US had crossed some rubicon by criminally charging a international head of state. “We don’t acknowledge Maduro because the president of Venezuela,” he reminded reporters after saying the indictments.
Hinting darkly at Washington’s imaginative and prescient for Venezuela’s future, Barr added: “Clearly we indicted Noriega beneath comparable circumstances, we didn’t acknowledge Noriega because the president of Panama.”
Additionally on rt.com
Like this story? Share it with a buddy!